fbpx

April 2019

Welcome and farewell. Farewell to RealTime, a 25-year publishing adventure that has come to a celebratory conclusion and welcome to the RealTime Archive, a massive documentation of a period of remarkable transformation driven by the artists who inspired us and to whom we and our many writers creatively responded. This will be a living archive with new overview essays and content guides coming online and enriched by UNSW Library’s wonderful exhibition In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, which features in this edition.

This final edition of RealTime celebrates the launching on 17 April of the archiving of the complete print editions 1994-2015 on the National Library of Australia’s TROVE website. The digitisation was initiated by UNSW academics and the UNSW Library which formed a partnership with the NLA, both institutions recognising the cultural and historical value of RealTime. We are deeply grateful for their support.

Improving the overall archive, we’ve upgraded the RealTime website, a treasure house of all editions placed online 1994-present, numerous features, a host of audio and video delights and some new content.

RealTime has been a way of life for us, of deep immersion in worlds conjured by adventurous artists across Australia and beyond. As art wondrously and radically mutated over the last 25 years, via experiment, hybridity and reaching beyond itself into science and numerous other fields, it changed the ways we receive and respond to it and, as writers, how we expressed the experience. We write about this in our essay for the In Response: Dialogue with RealTime catalogue. Our thanks to everyone who has been involved in RealTime — writers, artists, staff, Board members, funders and readers. Enjoy the archive and let us know how we can help you explore it. Virginia & Keith

Top image credit: Vitrine containing copies of RealTime print editions, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

Staged in the UNSW Library Exhibitions Space, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime is a unique exploration of the relationship between art and reviewing. It features Sydney-based artists who have been extensively covered in RealTime: Martin Del Amo, Branch Nebula (Lee Wilson, Mirabelle Wouters) and Vicki Van Hout.

 

River of playing cards from Vicki Van Hout’s Briwyant (2011), In Response, Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

Van Hout has recreated her striking river of playing cards set from Briwyant and invited her audience to engage with it; Branch Nebula has provided visitors with pencils to write on the walls their recollections of the works alongside vivid production photographs; and Martin Del Amo has juxtaposed memorable images by Heidrun Löhr of his works with reflections on the performances, including fascinating responses to RealTime reviews. As well each of the artists has made a live presentation which has been recorded for future open access. There are audio recordings of the artists being interviewed and RealTime writers reading reviews selected by the artists, alongside other archival material.

 

Exhibition signage and vitrine containing print editions of RealTime magazine, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

Cases display copies of RealTime open to the pages where works by the artists were reviewed, while others house artefacts from some of the productions. The mix of installation, performance and online material makes for an exhibition with depth and, given the online record, durability.

For a more detailed account of the exhibition and the artists’ presentations, go here.

We at RealTime are deeply grateful to Erin Brannigan and UNSW Library and staff for an exhibition which complements and enhances the impact of RealTime archive.

 

Audience members write comments, Branch Nebula artists’ presentation, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Jackson Mann

Here, from the UNSW Library website, is the background to the mounting of this exhibition and the crediting of the large number of contributors to its success.

“In Response: Dialogues with RealTime is an exhibition marking the closure of RealTime art magazine and the launch of its archive. RealTime was Australia’s critical guide to national and international contemporary arts 1994-2018 and has played a crucial role in documenting and providing critical commentary on innovative work in dance, performance, sound, music, film, digital media and visual art that carved out new terrain in those fields.

“Academics at UNSW have been working with the editors of RealTime Keith Gallasch and Virginia Baxter, UNSW Library and the National Library of Australia since 2017 to secure the RealTime archive in both its physical and digital form. The collaboration between UNSW and RealTime is celebrated through this exhibition that contributes to innovations at the interface between performance, the archive and the gallery.

 

Erin Brannigan introduces Martin Del Amo performance, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Jackson Mann

“The exhibition is presented as part of UNSW Library’s Exhibitions Program. It is co-curated by Dr Erin Brannigan (Senior Lecturer, School of the Arts & Media) and the artists in consultation with Jackson Mann (Curator, Special Collections and Exhibitions, UNSW Library), RealTime founders and editors, Virginia Baxter and Keith Gallasch, and fellow RealTime Guardians, Dr Erin Brannigan, Dr Caroline Wake, Gail Priest and Katerina Sakkas.

“The RealTime Archive is a collaboration between Open City Inc, National Library of Australia, the School of the Arts and Media, UNSW and UNSW Library.

“The artists involved took part in pilot archival projects at Critical Path, Australia’s centre for choreographic research and dance development, as part of Dancing Sydney: Mapping Movements: Performing Histories. This research project is led by Dr Erin Brannigan, Dr Amanda Card (University of Sydney) and Dr Julie-Anne Long (Macquarie University) and is supported by Critical Path and the NSW State Library.”

In Response: Dialogues with RealTime: Exhibition, 25 Feb-25 April, UNSW Library Exhibitions Space; performances: Martin del Amo, 28 Feb, Branch Nebula, 20 March, Vicki Van Hout, 10 April; RealTime Archive Launch, Wednesday 17 April, 6.00pm; UNSW, Kensington, Sydney

Top image credit: Mirabelle Wouters, Lee Wilson (Branch Nebula) in artists’ talk, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Jackson Mann

Across 2018 and into 2019 we’ve been building and reflecting on the RealTime archive, an exacting, exhilarating and moving experience. The process is largely complete, but we’ll keep adding to the website reflections, overviews and guides to content.

 

RealTime 1994-2015 on TROVE

We were excited and honoured in 2017 to be asked if we’d like UNSW Library to approach the National Library of Australia to form a partnership to digitise the RealTime print editions 1994-2015. The scanning of thousands of pages is expensive so we also welcomed UNSW Library’s financial investment and accepted the invitation for a major part of RealTime’s history to be preserved on the NLA’s Trove website. Dr Erin Brannigan, Senior Lecturer, School of the Arts & Media, UNSW, played a key role in negotiations. The recognition by NLA and UNSW Library of the cultural and historical value of RealTime is deeply satisfying.

You can find RealTime on TROVE here https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-733140625.

The great value of the digitising of the print editions is that not only the content of the magazine but also the design is preserved, as are the advertisements which in themselves from a valuable part of the historical record, and the editions are searchable.

 

The RealTime website

We’ve upgraded the RealTime website and substantially improved its Search facility. We’ve added Team to our menu, which will have entries for key staff and Board members over the years. New overview essays by writers reflecting on their years with RealTime are coming up as is a personal history of RealTime — you can read a sketch of it by Keith and Virginia here.

While TROVE archives the RealTime print edition 1994-2015, the RealTime Archives house:

RealTime 1994-2000: digitised print editions 1-40

RealTime 2001-2015: edition contents online without print layout or print advertisements

RealTime 2016-present: exclusively online editions

 

You’ll also find Features, which includes RealTime Dance, Media Art Archive, Video, Audio, RealTime Traveller and Special Editions.

 

New to the website: Special Editions

Special Editions includes digitised copies of RealTime onsite festival editions for Barrie Kosky’s 1996 Adelaide Festival and the 1998 and 2000 Robyn Archer Adelaide Festivals; the London International Festival of Theatre (LIFT) 1997; and the MAAP/Asia Pacific Triennial of 1999. These make for fascinating reading.

Also in Special Editions you’ll find the In Repertoire series of beautifully designed booklets 2000-2004 promoting internationally tourable Australian art, performance in particular. These were commissioned by the Australia Council for the Arts, edited and produced by RealTime and designed by Peter Thorn.

Also designed by Thorn is Dreaming in Motion, Celebrating Australia’s Indigenous Filmmakers, edited and produced by RealTime for the Indigenous Unit of the Australian Film Commission. It surveys a generation of filmmakers who emerged in the 1990s, many of whom are now leading practitioners. This small book is still the only one on the subject.

You’ll also find in Special Editions RealTime 1994-2017 Tributes, a collection of messages received and articles published when we announced at the end of 2017 that RealTime would cease regular publishing and focus on completing its archive before closing.

 

More…

Visit our website in coming months as we post further archival features. The RealTime website is a great portal to remarkable art and writing and an invaluable source for research.

In the wall notes below, written for his exhibit in In Response: Dialogues with RealTime in the UNSW Library Exhibitions Space, award-winning Sydney-based dancer and choreographer Martin Del Amo intimately and extensively reflects on works he’s made across his career alongside his responses to RealTime reviews of them. The juxtaposition of these with superb performance photographs, all by Heidrun Löhr with whom Del Amo has had a successful collaborative relationship, is a rich addition to the archive, for Del Amo himself, the dance community and RealTime. Eds.

 

Piece (1996)

The first solo I ever presented in Sydney was a Butoh-inspired piece set to Giacomo Puccini’s aria O Mio Babbino Caro sung by Victoria de Los Angeles. It was just under 3 minutes and I performed it on the final night of Performance Space’s Open ’96. The performance garnered me my first mention in RealTime. Caitlin Newton-Broad wrote: “Martin Del Amo gave a treasure to his audience, set simply to the ubiquitous opera number Oh my beloved father.” Only one sentence, but not a bad start!

Piece, Open ’96, Performance Space, Sydney, 1996; performer Martin Del Amo

 

Martin Del Amo, A Severe Insult to the Body (1997), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Heidrun Löhr, installation photo Keith Gallasch

A Severe Insult to the Body (1997)

I created A Severe Insult to the Body over a 3-month period in 1997. Its staging – I performed the piece in underpants and high heels, lit by a single spotlight from above – was a nod to the Queer Cabaret aesthetic prevalent in contemporary performance circles at the time. Choreographically, it was the first time I explored a strategy I would later call ‘physical fragmentation’ – the body is divided into separate body zones, each of which is choreographed independently from each other.

A Severe Insult to the Body was reviewed in RealTime at two different performances, with vastly different responses. Richard James Allen wrote in his review of Performance Space’s Open Season 97: “My Beautiful Laundrette meets Butoh Workshop 101 on the set of Silence of the Lambs. … What excuse is there for this kind of contortion?” Covering Sidetrack’s Contemporary Performance Week 8 a few months later, Virginia Baxter and Keith Gallasch wrote: “… Martin Del Amo was all spidery unease in the hypnotic A Severe Insult to the Body.”

In subsequent years A Severe Insult to the Body became somewhat of a signature piece of mine. I performed it in many different versions, in a variety of contexts, over a long period of time. Its last – maybe final – performance took place in 2017, as part of a residency showing at Critical Path for Dancing Sydney : mapping movements : performing histories. It marked the 20th anniversary of its creation.

A Severe Insult to the Body, Omeo Dance Studio, Sydney, 2003, performer Martin Del Amo

 

Unsealed (2004)

Unsealed is a 40-minute piece fusing idiosyncratic movement and intimate storytelling. Exploring the concept of ‘losing it,’ its aim was to playfully jump-cut between literal and metaphoric states of desire and deterioration. It was presented as part of a dance program at Performance Space called Parallax. Even though my work had been mentioned in RealTime before, it was the first time that I received a full-length review. What set it apart from the extremely positive reviews published in daily newspapers such as The Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian, was that it moved beyond mere evaluation and actually discussed my piece as a work of art, analysing and interpreting it. After months in the studio by myself, spending countless hours imagining what the work’s impact might be on an audience, I strongly appreciated a critical approach that seemed to enter into a direct dialogue with my practice. In his concluding paragraph, Keith Gallasch wrote: “At 40 minutes, Unsealed is a complete, quietly disturbing, confiding and important work from Martin Del Amo that makes an art of walking, invites our empathy and offers a sad paean to the virtues of melancholy.” Even though these sentences clearly demonstrate Gallasch’s appreciation of the work, what makes them stand out for me most are their interpretive insight.

Unsealed, Parallax, Performance Space, Sydney, 2004, performer Martin Del Amo

 

Martin Del Amo, Under Attack (2005), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Heidrun Löhr, installation photo Keith Gallasch

Under Attack (2005)

In 2003, my partner of many years – Benjamin Grieve – tragically died. This event plunged me into a prolonged state of grieving. In the following years, I worked feverishly, creating at least one work a year, alongside numerous studio showings and countless appearances in short works programs. Even though many of these works explored themes such as trauma, loneliness and instability, I was adamant that none of them were actually about my grief per se. I was aware, of course, that a lot of people interpreted it that way.

Needless to say, I found fault with the opening sentence of Keith Gallasch’s review of my 40-minute work Under Attack, presented at Performance Space’s Solo Series #1, produced by Onextra. The piece addressed the fragility of the human body under constant threat of aggressive forces – from digitilisation to decomposition. Gallasch wrote: “Following his Unsealed of 2004, Martin Del Amo’s Under Attack is another utterly engrossing solo, the second part in a trilogy, this one moving in even closer on the first part’s grief (the artist’s for the death of a lover) …”

It took me a long time to understand that maybe artists are not always the most reliable to comment on what motivates them to create work, as they aren’t always fully aware of what drives them. Now, years later, I still maintain that I never deliberately set out to make work that would help me process my grief, but I can accept Gallasch’s interpretation as a valid one.

Under Attack, Omeo Dance Studio, Sydney, 2005, performer Martin Del Amo

 

Martin Del Amo, Can’t Hardly Breathe (2006), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Heidrun Löhr, installation photo Keith Gallasch

Can’t Hardly Breathe (2006)

Can’t Hardly Breathe was conceived as a darkly humorous exploration of the relationship between obsession and trauma. It ran at about 25 minutes and was presented at Performance Space as part of a double-bill with spoken word performer and writer Rosie Dennis, with whom I shared a regular improvisational practice at the time.

When working on my solo Under Attack the year before, I decided to call it the second part of a trilogy with Unsealed being the first. Once Under Attack was completed, however, I realised that it made for a perfect companion piece to Unsealed and that a third piece was not needed. By the time I presented Can’t Hardly Breathe, I had begun preparations for a new full-length work set to premiere the year after and which would take me into new thematic territory. As a result, Can’t Hardly Breathe became a transitional piece – thematically related to its predecessors but already employing devices that I intended to explore further in the new work.

Unfortunately (and characteristically attentively), Keith Gallasch had not forgotten my talk about a trilogy and introduced the piece in his RealTime review as “the third part of Martin Del Amo’s trilogy (the other 2 are Unsealed [2004] and Under Attack [2005]) …” About the work, he said: “While not as structurally satisfying as its predecessors, Can’t Hardly Breathe is nonetheless memorable.” I admit that it’s a bittersweet experience when a review of your work is partially critical and you have to concede that the criticism is warranted. Luckily, the review ended on an encouraging note: “The desire to see all 3 works on the same program is unlikely to be met given the demands on the performer of just one of them—a pity, so let’s hope they’ve been seriously documented.”

Can’t Hardly Breathe, Mixed Double, Performance Space, Sydney, 2006, performer Martin Del Amo

 

Never Been This Far Away From Home (2007)

Never Been This Far Away From Home marked a thematic shift in my work as solo artist. Previous pieces had explored themes of physical and mental instability, presenting the self as a direct target of uncontrollable forces. This work introduced a more active, adventurous persona, keen to navigate both the exhilaration and dangers that come with moving away from ‘home’ beyond one’s comfort zone, into uncharted territories.

Produced by Performance Space and presented at its new home at Carriageworks, the piece was my first full-length solo work, shown outside the context of a double- or triple-bill. Not sharing a program with other artists guaranteed more creative freedom but also added pressure. Audiences would come to see my work and my work only. The success of the piece – or its failure – depended entirely on me and my creative team. What increased the pressure even more was that Never Been This Far Away From Home was the first piece to be presented at Carriageworks’ Bay 20. These circumstances mirrored the themes the work purported to explore in a scary way. This was definitely a journey into the unknown …

RealTime reviewer Jan Cornall seemed to be reading my mind: “The work of the solo performer is always risky. What if the telling fails, what if the audience doesn’t get it, what if they fall asleep—what if they want me to shut up and just dance?” To my great relief, Cornall concluded that I mastered the challenge. “Del Amo doesn’t falter over such concerns, but methodically carries out his set task—to share with us the journey of his explorations: notions of home, the void of fear, danger and the unknown, where the edges of dreaming and reality meet.”

Never Been This Far Away From Home, Clare Grant’s home and Carriageworks, Sydney, 2007, performer Martin Del Amo

 

Wall text (quoted from Pauline Manley’s RealTime review of Martin Del Amo’s It’s a Jungle Out There, 2009), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, installation photo Keith Gallasch

It’s a Jungle Out There (2009)

By 2009, I had consistently presented solo works for over five years, becoming somewhat of a fixture in the Sydney dance and performance scene. It slowly dawned on me that it wasn’t as easy to surprise audiences as it used to be, let alone ‘make a splash.’ People seemed to have formed a clear idea about who I was as an artist and what kind of work I would make. I realised that in order to grow as an artist and not constantly repeat myself, I would need to keep questioning my approach to creating and presenting work. While developing It’s a Jungle Out There, a new full-length work investigating the modern-day city as an ever-changing organism, I decided to conduct a series of research excursions. They were designed to heighten my perception of the city’s impact on the body, and included walking backwards through Sydney’s CBD, moving blindfolded alongside Parramatta Road during rush hour and crawling on all fours in The Rocks.

This set of circumstances was not lost on Pauline Manley, who wrote in her review for RealTime: “Martin Del Amo is ubiquitous. He pops up wild haired and undie-clad so often on the Sydney underground landscape that expectation is fashioned by familiarity. Yet he surprises. His insouciant belief in the inherent worth of what he has to say gives his work a trademark intensity that results from the piquancy of fascination and research. Whatever Del Amo is investigating, it is done with a ferocious and meticulous attention that is a lust to discover, uncover and reveal.”

It is probably also worth mentioning that in the late 2000s, Sydney’s independent dance and performance landscape started to rapidly change. Suddenly presentation opportunities were more likely to spring up in Western Sydney than in Sydney’s metropolitan area. Tellingly, It’s a Jungle Out There was the first work I did not premiere at Performance Space in over a decade. Instead, its final development and presentation were commissioned by Campbelltown Arts Centre. The piece, however, was presented by Performance Space at Carriageworks a year later as part of a tour that also included seasons at Dancehouse Melbourne, and Perth Institute of Contemporary Arts (PICA).

It’s a Jungle Out There, CBD Sydney, 2009, performer Martin Del Amo

 

What Good Is Sitting Alone In Your Room? (2010)

Around 2010, the focus of my choreographic practice started to shift as I gradually made the transition from solo artist to choreographer of works for others. Even though I did not create any new long-form solos for myself after 2009, I never gave up performing. Occasionally, I even presented a new short piece. What Good Is Sitting Alone In Your Room is a case in point. Originally created for Dance History at Campbelltown Arts Centre in 2010, the piece is both a tribute to and a deconstruction of the famous Bob Fosse style. It is set to a track from Gail Priest’s album Presentiments of the Spider Garden and contains the only high kick I have ever performed. Publicly that is …

Keith Gallasch and Virginia Baxter reviewed the work for RealTime when I performed it as part of the IOU Dance Solo Series in Spring Dance 2012 at Sydney Opera House. They wrote: “Del Amo’s trademark ambulatory movement is replaced by a series of poses that evoke the choreography of Bob Fosse but without the steps from which they would usually resolve—it’s funny, quite sexy, eliciting amused recognition from the audience.” I remember being surprisingly pleased with the review, especially because it described the piece as “sexy”—not an adjective I had ever come across in previous reviews of my work. It temporarily alleviated my anxieties around being an ageing dancer.

What Good Is Sitting Alone In Your Room?, IOU Dance, Io Myers Studio, Sydney, 2011, Martin Del Amo

 

Mountains Never Meet (2011)

The idea for Mountains Never Meet dates back to 2008 when I was commissioned to create a work for LINK, West Australia Academy of Performing Arts’ graduate dance company. The point of departure for the piece was to investigate the difference between walking and dancing and if, in fact, it was as significant as often perceived. The resulting work featured simple physical actions such as walking, running, skipping, standing, lying and jumping on the spot. Simultaneously it retained a maximum level of complexity in terms of choreographic devices related to speed, direction, levels and patterning. A few years later, when collaborating with footballer-turned-performance maker Ahilan Ratnamohan, I decided to remake the work but this time with a cast of untrained young men from Western Sydney. The idea was to see if, by relocating the original material within a diverse and dynamic community such as Western Sydney, the work would gain new layers of meaning. I was also interested in playfully challenging the notion of what dance can be and who can be a dancer.

Even though I had previously created group works for tertiary institutions and youth companies, Mountains Never Meet marked my official debut as a non-performing choreographer. It was also the first time in seven years that a work of mine did not receive a review in RealTime. In the lead up to its premiere, RealTime did, however, publish an interview with me. It was aptly conducted by Gail Priest who, up until then, had been my key collaborator, composing the soundtracks for all of my works as well as performing them live. Not surprisingly, the interview turned out to be rather candid: “Discussing his reasons for the transition from solo performer to director-choreographer, Del Amo cites Kate Champion from Force Majeure who was also, at one stage, best known for her solo works. ‘Kate said you can only mine yourself for material for so long and at some point you get more interested in other people’s backgrounds, stories and ideas. I think this is exactly what happened to me. I’ve always really enjoyed working by myself and having that freedom but sometimes I thought it would be nice to work with other bodies and have another input on that level’.”

Mountains Never Meet, Riverside Parramatta, Sydney, 2011, performers Ravin Lotomau, Frank Mainoo, Benny Ngo, Kevin Ngo, Ahilan Ratnamohan, Mahesh Sharma, Nikki-Tala Tuiala Talaoloa, Carlo Velayo, Dani Zaradosh

 

Paul White, Anatomy of an Afternoon (2012), choreographer Martin Del Amo, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, photo Heidrun Löhr; installation UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

Anatomy of an Afternoon (2012)

Anatomy of an Afternoon started life as a choreographic research project. In early 2011, I undertook a residency at Critical Path, collaborating with dancer Paul White and Dr Amanda Card in the role of research consultant. The aim of the project was to investigate how the practical exploration of an extant choreography would affect me as a choreographer creating original work. As the vehicle for this enquiry I chose Vaslav Nijinsky’s Afternoon of a Faun, a work that had fascinated me ever since I first became aware of it more than 20 years ago. Now considered an early modernist masterpiece, Afternoon of a Faun was first presented during the 1912 Ballets Russes season in Paris. At its premiere it caused a major scandal because of its overtly sexual nature.

Shifting the focus away from the faun character and seeking to physically capture the elusive nature of the afternoon, Anatomy of an Afternoon aimed to reimagine Nijinsky’s legendary choreography for a new century, exactly 100 years after its premiere. During its development phase, Paul White and I conducted a series of research excursions including visits to the zoo and task-based exercises outdoors. This was in keeping, we felt, with the spirit of experimentation that had fuelled the creation of Afternoon of a Faun. The approach proved to be controversial. At its premiere in the 2012 Sydney Festival at Sydney Opera House, Anatomy of an Afternoon prompted a series of audience walkouts. Reviews were rather mixed. Paul’s and my decision to stick to our guns was later recognised at the Helpmannn Awards. The piece was nominated for Best New Ballet or Dance Work, and Paul won for Best Male Dancer. In 2014 the work successfully toured to Southbank Centre London.

Like many critics, Keith Gallasch ‘wrestled’ with the work in his review for RealTime. He remained characteristically gracious though, querying the circumstances in which he saw the work: “I saw Anatomy of an Afternoon at a disadvantage, from the back of the Opera House’s Playhouse auditorium, deprived of the intimacy the work seemed to warrant and not terribly aware of White’s facial expressiveness mentioned by other audience members. However, White, as ever, moved superbly in a work that perhaps evolved too slowly to be consistently immersive and was curiously lacking a third dimension usually evident in the creations of choreographer (and RealTime correspondent) Martin Del Amo. But I’d love to see it again, up close.”

Anatomy of an Afternoon, Sydney Festival, Sydney Opera House, 2012, performer: Paul White

 

Slow Dances For Fast Times (2013)

Even after making the transition from solo artist to choreographer of works for others, the solo remained my preferred form for a long time. Nowhere was this more evident than in Slow Dances For Fast Times, presented by Carriageworks and produced by Performing Lines. Conceived as the dance equivalent of a concept album, the work comprised 12 short solos performed by 12 different dancers. The cast included some of the most highly regarded contemporary dancers from across Australia. It showcased the diversity of the sector – cultural, geographic, artistic and in terms of age and body type. For each piece, I closely collaborated with the solo performer in the creation of a unique choreographic portrait. The work was set to a series of recorded tracks, ranging from pop favourites and dance anthems of the last 50 years to a Spanish torch song and operatic arias. It culminated in a ‘bonus track’ finale involving all twelve dancers.

In some ways, Slow Dances For Fast Times was an extension of a strand of work that I developed as a solo artist. In addition to creating full-length works, I would also regularly perform short solos set to pop songs. This allowed me to show work outside of the conventional dance presentation circuit – in clubs, at parties, short works nights and festivals. Many of them originated as birthday presents for my friends, presented one-on-one in the studio first. On the other hand, Slow Dances For Fast Times also marked my most ambitious work to date in terms of scale, logistics and production values.

In her review for RealTime, Pauline Manley wrote, “certain recurrent physicalities reveal Del Amo’s choreographic proclivities: the gentle distortions of discomfort as bodies are drawn away from graceful wholeness … then there are those floating arms that trace, dangle and sway as body parts with mind. These arms are what most conjured the choreographer-body, making me miss Martin.” At the time, I felt that Manley’s compliment for me as a performer overshadowed not only my achievement as choreographer but also that of the other dancers. I was intent on establishing myself as choreographer and only too happy for people to forget my past as a solo artist. A few years on, with the benefit of hindsight, I have to say that I appreciate the notion that my work as a choreographer did not cancel out my work as a solo artist.

Slow Dances For Fast Times, Carriageworks, Sydney, 2013, performers Sara Black, Jade Dewi Tyas Tunggal, Benjamin Hancock, Raghav Handa, Julie-Anne Long, Jane McKernan, Sean Marcs, Kirk Page, Elizabeth Ryan, Luke Smiles, Vicki Van Hout, James Welsby

 

The Little Black Dress Suite (2013)

Sometime during 2012, it occurred to me that the Little Black Dress had become a recurring costume in my work. Within a period of two years, I had used fashion’s iconic garment for three separate pieces – always a different version of it, and always to a different effect. In one piece the LBD stood for show biz glamour. In another, it lent its performer a diva-like allure. In the third piece the dress was decidedly at odds with the performer’s actions. Before long I hatched the idea to draw these pieces together in a ‘suite,’ add another two, and present them all as part of the same program.

One of the things I most enjoy about being a choreographer is that I have the opportunity to regularly collaborate with other dancers. The Little Black Dress Suite was especially exciting in that respect. It allowed me to work with three dancers whom I greatly admire and whose performance skills I’m in awe of – Kristina Chan, Sue Healey and Miranda Wheen. Best of all, in one of the pieces, we got to perform together.

Not surprisingly, given the subject matter, Virginia Baxter’s review in RealTime was peppered with fashion references and sartorial puns: “T-dress, V-dress, vintage bandeau, slimline, full-skirted, reverse wrap, Audrey style, whatever, I know that the trick with the LBD is simply to wear it well. Here Martin Del Amo is the tailor and each of the dancers adds her/his own personality to the outfit to bring off the elegant display.” Baxter seemed to have as much fun with the work as we did performing it. “Finally all four dancers join in a careful pattern of slow, weaving movements in and around each other in a narrow horizontal plane to the aptly haunting song “Like An Angel Passing Through My Room.” In the end, like the iconic dress, it’s all about line and grace and these dancers, each in their own idiosyncratic way, appear to have that sewn up, carrying off the choreographer’s premise with aplomb.”

The Little Black Dress Suite, Riverside Parramatta, Sydney, 2013, performers Martin Del Amo, Kristina Chan, Sue Healey, Miranda Wheen

 

Songs Not To Dance To (2015)

My collaboration with Phil Blackman, a Lismore-based dance artist, started as an artistic ‘blind date’ as part of an exchange project, initiated by Campbelltown Arts Centre in partnership with NORPA (Northern Rivers Performing Arts). The aim of this initiative was to stimulate collaboration between metropolitan and regional dance makers. Over time, and after several development stages, Phil’s and my professional relationship grew into a committed artistic partnership, culminating in the presentation of full-length dance work Songs Not To Dance To at Parramatta Riverside. The piece was supported through FORM Dance Projects and produced by Performing Lines.

In Songs Not To Dance To, Phil and I set ourselves the challenge of performing to a series of ‘undanceable’ pieces of music. In attempting to do something seemingly impossible, we endeavoured to acquit ourselves, against all odds, with as much dignity, resilience and humour as possible. The soundtrack of the work included Whitney Houston’s And I Will Always Love You, Enrique Iglesias’ Hero and Jimmy Barnes’ Working Class Man. Those pop songs were interspersed with tracks from the album Book of Ways by legendary jazz pianist Keith Jarrett.

The final version of Songs Not To Dance To was not reviewed in RealTime. An earlier development, presented as part of Campbelltown Arts Centre’s Oh, I Wanna Dance With Somebody! was, however. Virginia Baxter wrote: “The two well-matched dancers are restrained as the airwaves fill with that orgy of self-affirmation, Christine Aguilera’s ‘Beautiful.’ This time, movement comes from the diaphragm. Unlike the calculated stiffness of the first piece, here the dance is angular, ungainly and then fluid; the performers working in close proximity developing a distinct weave of bodies, nearly entwining, almost but never quite intimate. Words won’t bring them down.” And later, summing up the work: “In this collaboration between region and city we experience another fulfilling engagement between two different but simpatico dancing bodies.”

Songs Not To Dance To, Campbelltown Arts Centre, Sydney, 2012, performers Martin Del Amo, Phil Blackman

 

Champions, Force Majeure (2017), choreographer Martin Del Amo, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, photo Heidrun Löhr, installation photo Keith Gallasch

Champions (2017)

When FORM Dance Projects first approached me with the idea to create a football-themed dance piece, I could hardly believe my luck. I had always been fascinated with the inherently choreographic nature of group sports, particularly soccer. The prospect of making a work that would draw parallels between football and contemporary dance excited me. Early on in my conversations with FORM, we decided that the cast should be all-female as that would allow us to question pervasive notions of who qualifies as dance / sports champions in a culture that generally underappreciates the achievements of female performers, both in sport and in the arts.

Over a period of two years, the dancers and I worked closely with a team of artistic collaborators to create Champions as a large-scale work, playfully challenging what dance is and how it can be presented. Our research included consultations with the coaches, athletes and physio-therapists from the Western Sydney Wanderers FC, as well as conversations with players from the Matildas squad. Choreographic inspiration was drawn from training drills, warm up rituals, victory dances, and body language expressing triumph and defeat. Channel Seven sports presenter Mel McLaughlin came on board to provide tongue-in-cheek commentary and interviews with the dancers. The work premiered at Carriageworks’ Bay 17 in the 2017 Sydney Festival.

The greatest dramaturgical challenge in developing Champions was the question of how to harness the energy and enthusiasm of the stadium experience but not merely emulate it. According to Keith Gallasch’s review in RealTime, we almost got there: “Director Del Amo cleverly suffuses sports team movement with the characterful detail dancers can bring to walking, running, jumping, ducking and weaving and standing still in formation. There’s a fine interplay between team and individuals with room for some more expressive play from the latter. Champions is never less than enjoyable, the team an impressive one, and if the overall game plan is a touch re-thought, it could be a winner.”

Champions, Sydney Festival, Carriageworks, Sydney, 2017, performers Sara Black, Kristina Chan, Cloé Fournier, Carlee Mellow, Sophia Ndaba, Rhiannon Newton, Katina Olsen, Marnie Palomares, Melanie Palomares, Kathryn Puie, Miranda Wheen.

 

In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, Martin Del Amo, photographer Heidrun Löhr, UNSW Library, Sydney, 25 Feb-25 April

Martin Del Amo, originally from Germany, is a Sydney-based choreographer and dancer. He started out as a solo artist, acclaimed for his full-length solos fusing idiosyncratic movement and intimate storytelling. In recent years, Martin has also built a strong reputation as a creator of group works and solos for others. His most recent production, Champions (2017 Sydney Festival, FORM Dance Projects), was awarded the 2018 Australian Dance Award for Outstanding Achievement in Independent Dance. Other works include Songs Not To Dance To (Parramatta Riverside, 2015), Slow Dances For Fast Times (Carriageworks, 2013) and Mountains Never Meet (Parramatta Riverside, 2011). Martin’s Helpmann Award-winning Anatomy of an Afternoon, a solo for Paul White, which premiered at the Sydney Opera House in the 2012 Sydney Festival, was presented with great success at Southbank Centre London in 2014. Martin regularly teaches for a wide range of arts organisations and companies, and has worked extensively as mentor, consultant, dramaturg and dance writer. His work has toured nationally in Australia and internationally to the UK, Japan and Brazil. Martin is a 2015 Sidney Myer Creative Fellow.

Top image credit: Martin Del Amo, performance lecture, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Jackson Mann

You’re invited to the launch of RealTime on TROVE at 6pm, Wednesday 17 April, UNSW Library Exhibitions Space. In recognition of the cultural and historical value of the magazine, the 130 print editions of RealTime 1994-2015 have been archived on the National Library of Australia’s TROVE website, the result of a partnership between the NLA and UNSW Library Sydney. We’re also upgrading the RealTime website with its massive documentation of responses to 25 years of transformative art-making.

There’ll be presentations by Martin Del Amo, Branch Nebula, Vicki Van Hout, Virginia Baxter and Keith Gallasch and the archive will be launched by Professor Sarah Miller AM. Refreshments will be served.

We hope to see you there to farewell the magazine and welcome the archive.

It’s also an opportunity to see the In Response: Dialogues with RealTime exhibition in the UNSW Library Exhibitions Space before it closes 25 April.

RealTime Archive Launch, 6pm, Wednesday 17 April, Exhibition Space, Level 5, UNSW Library. Access via UNSW Gate 8, High St, Kensington

Top image credit: Vicki Van Hout performs an excerpt from Briwyant (2011), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, photo Keith Gallasch

The artists participating in In Response: Dialogues with RealTime each made a presentation talking and performing to the photographs or other images they displayed in their discrete exhibition spaces within the overall UNSW Library Exhibitions Space.

Martin Del Amo commenced his presentation amiably guiding us through the photographs by Heidrun Löhr that have dynamically documented his dance career since 1996. At one point he narrated, while performing, his motivations for a series of movements from a work in which parts of the body moved, counter to expectation, in opposition to each other. The telling took his breath away, and ours.

Martin moved into the larger forward space of the gallery with another engrossing performance. You see him here hovering over a vitrine of RealTime magazines folded open to pages where the In Response… artists had been reviewed. Next to each photograph in his exhibition space was commentary on his recollections of the works and his finely tuned responses to RealTime reviews by Keith Gallasch, Pauline Manley, Jan Cornall and Virginia Baxter.

 

Mirabelle Wouters, Lee Wilson (Branch Nebula), artists’ talk, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Jackson Mann

With a participatory spirit, Mirabelle Wouters and Lee Wilson, the Artistic Directors of Branch Nebula, canvassed audience memory, asking us to write on the walls with pencils responses to the many works featured photographically and arranged in fascinating constellations. Beneath this image an audience member wrote: “Intimate duo that gutted me.”

 

Installation image: Plaza Real, performers Keith Lim, Emma J Hawkins, Branch Nebula and Urban Theatre Projects, 2004, photo Heidrun Löhr, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, installation photo Keith Gallasch

The couple then quizzed each other about the joys and tribulations of their joint career and their creative communication and then invited some of their collaborators to speak from the floor about their joint experiences. Expertly produced video projections furthered the sense of this company’s distinctive performance style and design.

Mirabelle and Lee thanked RealTime for consistent attention to their work, not least earlier on when mainstream media found it difficult to categorise their practice or confined them to “physical theatre.” Mirabelle recalled that in her home country Belgium, where she and Lee met and worked together, that “anything that moves” was claimed for dance, but not in Australia. Anyone who’s seen Branch Nebula at work knows that there’s a distinct choreographic impulse at work, not least in the company’s skateboard park creations.

 

Vicki Van Hout, Henrietta Baird perform an excerpt from Briwyant (2011), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

For her presentation, Vicki Van Hout was joined by Henrietta Baird for a vigorously danced conversational duet from Vicki’s major 2011 work Briwyant, performed here on Vicki’s recreation of the river of playing cards set she’d made for the production. The fast-paced, highly articulated performance was a pleasure to experience in the intimate space beneath a shadowy web cast wide by a suspended hand-woven sculpture, a new version of one made by Vicki for her work plenty serious TALK TALK.

 

Vicki Van Hout performs an excerpt from Briwyant (2011), In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, 2019, photo Keith Gallasch

Vicki spoke eloquently of how important RealTime reviews had been for her career as artist and also writer. She spoke of how the reviews seemed especially not to speak from outside the experience of the works reviewed. She then invited the audience to meticulously replace the playing cards dislodged or bent by the dancing while telling of the design’s original epic making, her mother’s committed if drolly ironic help with the task, and the meaning of the river the cards.

In Response: Dialogues with RealTime: Exhibition, 25 Feb-25 April, UNSW Library Exhibitions Space; performances: Martin Del Amo, 28 Feb, Branch Nebula, 20 March, Vicki Van Hout, 10 April; RealTime Archive Launch, Wednesday 17 April, 6.00pm; UNSW, Kensington, Sydney

Top image credit: Martin Del Amo at vitrine, lecture performance, In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, UNSW Library, photo Jackson Mann

“It’s thrilling that the artists in this exhibition are responding to our attention to their creations, years and even decades after their making and our reviewing. This is strange, rare and welcome: ephemerality suspended and hitherto unspoken dialogues given new voice and longevity. The loop formed between reviewer and work (implicitly the artist) is being regenerated, experiences recalled in vivid detail and estimations reconsidered: the loop keeps turning.” Keith Gallasch, Virginia Baxter, catalogue essay

 

The UNSW Library exhibition, curated by Dr Erin Brannigan with the participating artists Martin Del Amo, Branch Nebula and Vicki Van Hout, features installations by each of the artists and live presentations. The latter have been video recorded and will become publicly available. As well, Erin Brannigan has recorded interviews with the artists, writers reading their RealTime reviews and other archival material.

Edited by Erin, a writer on dance for RealTime since 1997 and a Senior Lecturer in Theatre and Performance Studies at UNSW, the catalogue features essays on the relationship between the exhibited artists and reviews that appeared in the magazine.

Dramaturg John Baylis writes about Branch Nebula, dancer Lizzie Thompson on Vicki Van Hout and dance scholar Amanda Card on Martin Del Amo. Keith Gallasch and Virginia Baxter delineate their vision of the art of reviewing.

The exhibition, the performative presentations and the associated online material helps sustain the RealTime archive while simultaneously furthering its reach and cultural value.

Read the catalogue here.

In Response: Dialogues with RealTime: Exhibition, 25 Feb-25 April, UNSW Library Exhibitions Space; performances: Martin Del Amo, 28 Feb, Branch Nebula, 20 March, Vicki Van Hout, 10 April; RealTime Archive Launch, Wednesday 17 April, 6.00pm; UNSW, Kensington, Sydney

Regeneration

It’s thrilling that the artists in the In Response: Dialogues with RealTime exhibition are responding to our attention to their creations, years and even decades after their making and our reviewing. This is strange, rare and welcome: ephemerality suspended and hitherto unspoken dialogues given new voice and longevity. The loop formed between reviewer and work (implicitly the artist) is being regenerated, experiences recalled in vivid detail and estimations reconsidered: the loop keeps turning.

 

Bodies & languages

In RealTime we have tracked the careers of Martin Del Amo, Vicki Van Hout and Branch Nebula. We have learned the language of each — images, movement, sometimes words. We know their bodies of work, if never utterly, for, being risk-takers, they always surprise with new works, as they did at first meeting when we entered their worlds and were changed, compelled to re-think possibilities of form and embodied thought.

 

Close encounters

In our RealTime review-writing workshops both here and overseas we propose that encountering an artwork should be like meeting a stranger — a possibly intriguing, charismatic, complicated, unpredictable, difficult person — requiring patience and generosity to understand, let alone empathise with. Each work, after all, is an artist’s avatar. The encounter requires openness and self-awareness, knowing one’s own desires, limitations, aversions and prejudices, especially when dealing with the unusual works we were attracted to and which were burgeoning in the 1990s, if then being granted little serious critical attention.

 

Looping

Borrowing from phenomenology, we see this encounter as a loop formed between audience and artwork, not only in the moment but in subsequent recollection, discussion with friends and, of course, in reading reviews and other writings. The more subtle or powerful the encounter, the more enduring the loop, with other opinions and responses fuelling it. The more deeply imbued in body and psyche, the longer the work is remembered, but it is also simultaneously subject to change as aesthetic, intellectual and political values evolve.

 

Temporal disparities

As actors, writer-performers and producers for the two decades before we initiated RealTime, we knew what it was like to create a work over, say, a year or two, perform it for a few hours nightly for several weeks and to have it reviewed in considerably less time; the very real time of the work reduced to 300-500 words in a newspaper, sometimes insightfully, sometimes not. These disproportionate time-scales seemed profoundly unfair. As reviewers and editors we wished to compensate for this inequity with more generous deadlines, longer reviews, where possible, and an honest disavowal of critical ‘objectivity’ in favour of considered and informed subjectivity.

 

Openness & real time

RealTime has been published by Open City, a company we formed to produce collaborative performances and other works in 1987. The name reflected our desire to be open to new art experiences, to collaboration, and to generating a sense of community. In 1994 we launched RealTime, the title indicative of a focus on live performance in music, sound, dance, opera, theatre, contemporary performance and performance art at a moment when cross-artform practices were beginning to flourish and new temporalities were being generated by new media art, often at the intersection of the real and the virtual. These works required increased attentiveness from reviewers dealing with multiple artforms and having to find the language with which to express unprecedented experiences.

 

Present tense, fidelity & judgment

We often encouraged our writers to compose in present tense in order to evoke a sense of immediacy. And, forestalling a rush to judgment, we also asked for vivid, concise evocations of what the reviewer saw, heard and otherwise sensed — attentive to a work’s surface, comprising as it does much of the evidence with which the reviewer plays prosecutor, defense, judge and juror, whether a final judgment is made explicit or is implied. We hoped that each review would draw the reader into that same experiential loop, providing a palpable sense of works often unlikely to be seen by many readers across Australia and beyond. Above all, we sought fidelity to the work, a descriptive evocation, regardless of final judgment.

 

The art affect

Reviewing demands heightened sensory awareness. There is nothing passive in being fully open to a performance. Engaged, we seem to forget our bodies and conscious selves, but contrary to this apparent emptiness we loop with the work, interiorising bodies and voices and design, a dancer’s sway, an instrument’s reverberance, the deep pull of gravity and release from it in circus, and in dance and music too. Visceral art hits the gut, sensual art brushes against the skin without touching. We shiver with fear, we sweat, hold our breath. Ideas delight, thrill, inspire, frighten or offend with palpable force. New media works test, disorient and expand our perceptual abilities. Relational art places our bodies inside the art, sometimes as co-creators, radically reducing the space between work and audience in the art-making loop.

Time is felt: the near-indescribable tension between moment and momentum in much art. Elsewhere we treasure the moment, welcoming imagistic works that refuse narrative compulsion, or, in recent dance and performance, seek transcendence and authenticity in ecstatic states and the ‘now.’ A vast number of works from at least the 1990s to the present have focused on the complexities of body, mind-body and perception in all their physiological, social and political dimensions, requiring of reviewers unprecedented attention to the work, self- awareness, and the demands on knowledge brought on by proliferating cross-artform and hybrid practices.

 

Reviewing the self

One of our occasional workshop exercises involves participants self-reviewing (how they see themselves, how they engage socially). As the learner-reviewer grows cognisant of the workings of the loop, registering each intellectual, perceptual, visceral response, they learn there will be moments when the exchange between reviewer and work falters or the loop locks or breaks. Often the first impulse is to blame the work. A better response is to first query one’s attentiveness or courage to risk the vertigo of new experience, to put oneself in the way of risk-taking artists, to become a risk-taker, share in the ways a body can say, think, be.

 

Reviewing in real time

Unless the response is hurried, formulaic and premediated, the real time of writing a review is intense, the work experienced is re-lived and newly imagined; one’s preconceptions have to be denied, ignorance acknowledged, vocabulary tested and expanded, the means to address work, artist and reader grappled with — review as statement, essay, prose-poem, combinations of these. As the loop turns, as images settle and the work’s shape becomes clearer, the reviewer can be surprised at their re-estimation of the initial response, partly rational, partly as if the review is writing itself, partly like dream work — making sense of why elements of the work provoked feelings of discomfort, unlikely pleasure, or of a haunting.

 

Reviewer as sharer

Artists are profound sharers. Whether seen as conduits, gatekeepers or judges, reviewers too are sharers. Ecologically, they might be seen as parasites (sometimes advantageously for art, as per Darwinian mutualism) or pollinators (attracted to art they spread its affects, at best making ‘honey’ of their writing) or, alternatively they are inhibitors and predators. In the era of YouTube and video documentation, reviewers are potentially supplantable, but the screen cannot tell what it was like to ‘actually be there’ and, when art and reviewer are as one, becoming part of an enduring loop.

 

Responsibility & humility

The reviewer’s compulsion to share their responses publicly is driven by considerable self-belief, varying degrees of expertise, and a passion to understand, belong to and have free access to an artistic milieu and its works. It might be driven by a felt need to support a particular form, a group of innovators, or specific communities. Whatever the motivation, the responsibility is enormous, not least now as reviewing is reduced to likes and blunt opinion-making while seeking new forms and platforms. Given the enormous temporal disparities between the making of a work and the execution of a response, the review must above all be humble before art, address it with fidelity and openness, alert to the workings — aesthetic, intellectual, intuitive, instinctive, perceptual and corporeal — of the loops that bind us enduringly to art and which represent the ways art transforms us, perhaps temporarily, possibly permanently.

 

The artists: agents of change

The works of Martin Del Amo, Vicki Van Hout and Branch Nebula (Lee Wilson, Mirabelle Wouters) have become a part of our lives. They have changed us in the ways we experience and understand the expressive potentials of dance and contemporary performance. Each of these artists has a very special sense of space and design. Collectively, they bring unexpected subject matter to performance — the everyday, sport, play, work, cultural heritage, and idiosyncratic personal and political concerns. They are also intensely collaborative, working at various times with suburban and regional communities, sometimes with those seemingly unlikely to associate with art. The experiential loops they generate go well beyond individual works. It has been our honour and pleasure to engage with their creations and bring our readers to recognise their enduring importance.

 

Thanks

This essay appears in the catalogue for the UNSW Library exhibition In Response: Dialogues with RealTime and is reproduced with thanks to the library,

We are deeply grateful to Erin Brannigan for initiating and co-curating In Response: Dialogues with RealTime with the participating artists, to UNSW Library for presenting the exhibition, and to the project’s other partners. We thank UNSW Library and the National Library of Australia for partnering to place RealTime print editions 1994- 2015 online on the TROVE site. We also greatly appreciate the Australia Council for the Arts’ decades of support for a bold publishing project, Guardians of RealTime members Erin Brannigan, Gail Priest, Caroline Wake and Katerina Sakkas for their passion to preserve the RealTime legacy, and Open City’s Board, Tony MacGregor, John Davis, Julie Robb, Urszula Dawkins and Phillipa McGuinness, for their collective wisdom and unstinting encouragement.

In Response: Dialogues with RealTime: Exhibition, 25 Feb-25 April, UNSW Library Exhibitions Space; performances: Martin Del Amo, 28 Feb, Branch Nebula, 20 March, Vicki Van Hout, 10 April; RealTime Archive Launch, Wednesday 17 April, 6.00pm; UNSW, Kensington, Sydney

Top image credit: Keith Gallasch, Virginia Baxter admire Unicorn (1984) by Bronwyn Oliver in performance titled Small Talk in Big Rooms, Writers in Recital, 1991, Art Gallery NSW. Sculpture collection of and image courtesy Art Gallery of NSW.

This is a factual history; a personal one will emerge once we’ve had time to reflect on the experience that has been RealTime, taking us across Australia and overseas, producing associated publications and enjoying the pleasure of being part of a far flung network of writers alert to innovative practices predominantly in the small to medium sector but also the mainstream when it took risks.

 

Before RealTime

In 1987 in Sydney, writer-performers Virginia Baxter and Keith Gallasch formed the performance company Open City, producing works 1987-1996 principally at The Performance Space as well as appearing in and collaborating on experimental radio works for ABC radio. [See Team for more biographical detail.]

 

The making of RealTime

In 1994, with Open City as publisher, Managing Editors Virginia and Keith boldly launched RealTime as a free national arts magazine, focused on innovation in the arts and countering limited mainstream media attention to a wealth of emerging experimental and hybrid arts practices. The first edition, seed-funded by the Australia Council for Arts, was passionately welcomed by artists and readers. Securing ongoing funding, the magazine grew in print numbers and distribution reach, peaking in the 2000s with 56-page tabloid bi-monthly editions, 27,000 copies delivered to 1,000 locations across Australia.

From the beginning, contemporary performance, adventurous theatre and innovative dance featured strongly in RealTime alongside contemporary classical and experimental music, sound art, film, video and emerging digital media art which quickly pervaded most other practices. RealTime also focused on Indigenous art, innovative regional practices and the work of artists with disability. Australian writers travelling to overseas arts events provided RealTime readers with an international perspective. Only in RealTime could coverage of innovation of this scope and across the arts be found under one cover, alerting local artists to the work of their peers across Australia and beyond.

RealTime quickly became a highly trusted journal of record and critique, producing responsive, much quoted reviews and maintaining long-form reviewing as it otherwise diminished in Australia’s newspapers.

 

RealTime writing, RealTime writers

Central to Keith and Virginia’s editorial vision was that the reviewer vividly evoke each work under review, to do justice to the work as a real time experience. It forestalled a critical rush to judgement, asking the reviewer to take the reader with them on the path to making it, or a provisional evaluation. This ‘experiential’ reviewing was formed under the influence of Susan Sontag (Against Interpretation, On Style), American dance reviewers (Deborah Jowitt, Sally Banes) and the field of perceptual phenomenology. The editors encouraged constructive criticism from a position of “considered subjectivity.”

RealTime writers have been artists of many kinds, artist-academics, curators, novelists and a variety of arts specialists. The editors encouraged and mentored numerous artists to write, to draw from the deep knowledge of their practices. RealTime editorial, sales and technical staff have also been predominantly artists, working part-time while pursuing their practices and writing extensively for the magazine.

 

Online in 1996

In 1996, with considerable foresight, Virginia and Keith established the RealTime website, publishing online reviews in response to Barrie Kosky’s Adelaide Festival. From that year on every bi-monthly print edition was also published online, reaching a greater range of readers, some 35% of them overseas. In 2009, an online producer was appointed to deliver more frequent emailed editions, paving the way to sole online weekly publishing in 2016-17.

 

Workshops around the world

From 1995-2017 RealTime received 35 commissions from international and local art festivals and arts organisations in London, Bristol, Vancouver, Jakarta, Singapore and Lyon, every Australian capital city and Darwin, Bendigo, Cairns and Albury to run review-writing workshops or reviewing teams, often publishing daily online. These were variously conducted by Keith, Virginia and Associate Editor Gail Priest, a key RealTime staff member in layout, sales, writing and online production 1997-2014, as well as by music reviewer Matthew Lorenzon in 2015-17, often yielding new writers for RealTime.

 

The knowledge: other publications

Drawing on RealTime’s archive and the extensive knowledge of its editors, the Australia Council for the Arts commisisoned the highly respected and internationally distributed In Repertoire series (1999-2004) promoting tourable Australian art. For the Australian Film Commission’s Indigenous Film Unit, RealTime edited and produced Dreaming in Motion, A Celebration of Australian Indigenous Filmmaking (AFC-RealTime, 2007), the first and, currently, only account of a generation of now acclaimed filmmakers.

In 2014, RealTime and Adelaide’s Wakefield Press co-published the Australia Council-supported Bodies of Thought: 12 Australian Choreographers, essays and interviews focused on a generation of independent choreographers who emerged in the 1990s and came into prominence in the 2000s. The book is one of the very few on contemporary Australian dance. Bodies of Thought was edited by Dr Erin Brannigan, UNSW, a long-term RealTime contributor, and Virginia Baxter.

 

The final years

By 2014, after many years of successfully publishing RealTime in print, the media marketplace had changed radically. Social media substantially diminished advertising sales income, rendering the printing of the magazine (with its huge carbon footprint) unviable. The printing of the magazine ceased with the December 2015 edition. In 2016-17 RealTime was published weekly online, featuring many online-friendly and often labour intensive innovations, but with little benefit for selling advertising. The Editors and the Board of Open City decided to cease publication at the end of 2017 and, with the support of the Australia Council, commit the 2018 program to building and celebrating the archive. A saddened readership sent hundreds of messages (you can read them here) of condolence and congratulation for a near-quarter century of uninterrupted publishing and wonderful support for artists and readers, charting a period of enormous change in the arts.

 

The Archive: TROVE

In 2017, UNSW Library approached Open City, publisher of RealTime, via Dr Erin Brannigan, a Real Time contributing editor and Senior Lecturer in Theatre and Performance Studies, School of the Arts and Media, UNSW, to propose the archiving of the 130 editions of the print magazine 1994-2015 on the National Library of Australia’s TROVE website. The proposal was gratefully accepted.

Open City signed an agreement with the NLA to digitise the editions and the UNSW Library and NLA agreed to partner the archiving, with UNSW Library and Open City contributing to covering the costs of the digitisation.

The searchable NLA digitisation wonderfully preserves not only the content of RealTime, but also Graeme Smith’s design as it evolved over the years from 1994 onwards, but also the advertising which is often historically informative in itself. Visit the archive here https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-733140625.

 

The Archive: RealTime website

Redesigned in 2017 by Graeme Smith and built by Melbourne’s The Mighty Wonton, the RealTime website houses digitised print editions from 1994-2000 and all editions as they appeared online 2001-2018, plus a multitude of video interviews, sound art, video art, travel features and festival reports.

 

Thanks from the Managing Editors

From seed funding in 1994 to project and then triennial and four-year funding, as well as from VACS [National Visual Arts and Crafts Strategy], the Australia Council has consistently supported Open City for the publishing of RealTime, an indication of responsive policy-making and the continuing high regard of artist peers on assessment panels have had for the publication. Arts NSW also funded Open City for much of RealTime’s history until grants became sporadic and were no longer pursued. Vertel, a Sydney-based telecommunications company, provided welcome substantial technical sponsorship in recent years.

Thanks go to Keith and Virginia’s fellow Board of Management members — Tony MacGregor, John Davis, Julie Robb, Urszula Dawkins and Phillipa McGuinness — for their constant encouragement, understanding and friendship.

Also greatly appreciated is the genius of Graeme Smith for providing RealTime with a distinctively lucid visual identity over the decades, and The Mighty Wonton’s Lee Wong for her patient and inventive realisation of the latest manifestation as our new website.

RealTime staff of many years have fuelled the magazine with passion, loyalty and creativity: most recently Katerina Sakkas, Lauren Carroll Harris and Lucy Parakhina and, above all, Gail Priest who joined RealTime 1997 and left in 2014 but has continued to contribute and advise, drawing on her vast knowledge of the workings of the publication.

The Guardians of RealTime committee (Erin Brannigan, Caroline Wake, Katerina Sakkas, Lucy Parakhina, Gail Priest) have helped maintain the RealTime vision in its archival stage. Erin has initiated and superbly curated In Response: Dialogues with RealTime, an exhibition in the UNSW Library Exhibition Space featuring installations and performances by the artists Martin Del Amo, Branch Nebula and Vicki Van Hout, subjects of many RealTime reviews and articles.

We thank the many artists who have inspired us, and the writers who have contributed to RealTime, some since the 1990s to very recently, many for five to 10 years or more, for their commitment, skill and judicious insights. As not a few writers have said, a sense of community was shared across artforms and across the country. And finally, we extend our gratitude to our readers, the greater part of that community.

Virginia Baxter & Keith Gallasch
Managing Editors RealTime

Top image credit: From Sam James’ video documentation of RealTime coming off the presses at Spotpress, graphic design Graeme Smith for RealTime 101 Feb-Mar, 2011

Above – The RealTime team in 2014: Managing Editors Virginia Baxter and Keith Gallasch in 2014 with Associate Editor and Online Producer Gail Priest, Sales Manager Katerina Sakkas and Administrative Assistant Felicity Clark photographed by the doyen of performance photographers in Sydney, Heidrun Lohr.

This page, a work-in-progress, will feature entries about key staff and Board of Management members from over the years. We’ll soon be adding entries to Team about key RealTime staff.

Keith Gallasch, Virginia Baxter, RealTime 20th Birthday celebration and launch of the RealTime-Wakefield publication Bodies of Thought: 12 Australian Choreographers, 2014, photo Sandy Edwards

Virginia Baxter & Keith Gallasch

Virginia Baxter & Keith Gallasch. Theatre and contemporary performance practitioners, Virginia and Keith founded RealTime in 1994 as Managing Editors, editing, writing, running the business, producing specialist publications and conducting review writing workshops here and overseas.

This is a biographical sketch which we’ll flesh out once we’ve had time to sit back and reflect on our 25-year RealTime adventure.

We are Directors on the Board of Management of Open City Inc and Managing Editors of RealTime. Open City Inc was founded by us on the principle of openness: free access, collaboration, critical responsiveness, both as a performance company, 1987-1996, and as the publisher of RealTime, 1994-present, other publications and books, in forums and writers’ workshops.

Prior to forming Open City, we had been members in the 1970s of Troupe, the first independent Adelaide theatre company committed to nurturing Australian playwriting. Keith acted, directed and wrote for Troupe and subsequently wrote for youth theatre companies in the early 80s and Legs on the Wall in the late 80s. He was a member of the Literature Board of the Australia Council, 1983-5. In the 1990s and early 2000s Keith was dramaturg for four productions by Griffin Theatre Company (including for two AWGIE-winning scripts) and one for Vitalstatistix.

In the early 80s in Adelaide, after acting with Troupe, Virginia wrote and performed two solo works, Just Walk and What Time Is This House? She was the Chair (1992-99) of Playworks, the National Women Writers’ Workshop and edited the collected papers and performance texts of Playworks’ 10th anniversary event in 1995 as Telling Time (Playworks, 1997; revised 1999). She has worked as a dramaturg on performance and dance projects and was co-curator of the 2002 Antistatic contemporary dance event at Performance Space.

For 22 years, we have written, commissioned, managed RealTime’s production, finances, distribution and sales, and conducted workshops here and overseas while maintaining the collaborative and responsive vision that is our own. In this we have been supported by committed and creative staff who are also writers.

Drawing on RealTime’s archive and the extensive knowledge of its editors, the Australia Council for the Arts commissioned the highly respected and internationally distributed In Repertoire series (1999-2004) which we edited, promoting tourable Australian contemporary performance, music theatre, dance [two editions], Indigenous arts, new media art and theatre for young people.

For the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Australian Film Commission (AFC) Keith and Virginia edited and produced Explorations: Films Indigènes d’Australie (2002), a catalogue accompanying a set of films gifted to the French Government in celebration of the voyage of Nicolas Baudin to Australia. For the AFC’s Indigenous Film Unit, RealTime edited and produced Dreaming in Motion, A Celebration of Australian Indigenous Filmmaking (AFC-RealTime, 2007), the first account of a generation of now acclaimed filmmakers.

In 2014, RealTime and Adelaide’s Wakefield Press co-published Bodies of Thought: 12 Australian Choreographers, edited by Dr Erin Brannigan, UNSW, a long-term RealTime contributor, and Virginia; the project was managed by Keith. This collection of essays and interviews focused on a generation of independent choreographers who emerged in the 1990s and came into prominence in the 2000s. The book is one of the very few substantial volumes on Australian dance.

We are currently working with co-editor SJ Norman (a leading Indigenous interdisciplinary artist) on a book about innovative Aboriginal art across the last two decades.